We close the week with a statement that brings together the entire arc of the week’s exploration into a single, precise formulation. We have examined the shift from organisational consumerism to the producer mindset, the distinction between resiliency and citizenship, the strength of civic affinities, the three-layer model of organisational capacity, the practice of the tripartite asset map and the sobering lessons of the SHOW-21 research. All of these threads converge in the principle that Deborah Puntenney articulates: that sustainability is not an external grant to be received but an internal condition to be built.
“Sustainability can be achieved when organisations recognise and understand the full measure of their assets and capacities and then build upon them, generating strong relationships among the internal and external components of the organisation’s milieu.” Deborah L. Puntenney (A guide to building sustainable organisations from the inside out)
What the definition tells us
Puntenney’s definition begins with recognition: the act of seeing clearly what the organisation already holds. This is the work of the tripartite asset map, the gift inventory and the three-layer assessment. It is the prior step that organisational consumerism consistently skips. Recognition, in Puntenney’s framework, is not a passive acknowledgement. It is an active, rigorous and disciplined process of discovery.
The second element is building: the move from recognition of assets to the construction of something new upon that foundation. This building is the generation of strong relationships: the living connections between the internal components of the organisation, its staff, board and volunteers, and the external components, its constituents, its civic network and its peer organisations. These relationships are the architecture of sustainability.
The milieu as the unit of sustainability
Puntenney’s use of the word milieu is deliberate and significant. The milieu of an organisation is not just its immediate internal environment. It is the full social, civic and institutional ecology within which it operates. Sustainability is not achieved by making the organisation stronger in isolation. It is achieved by deepening the organisation’s embeddedness in its milieu: by strengthening the relationships between the organisation and every component of the complex human environment it both shapes and depends upon. The sustainable organisation is not the one with the largest reserves. It is the one whose relationships, with its community, its peers and its own people, are most deeply and genuinely reciprocal.
Building toward the inside-out organisation
The inside-out organisation that Puntenney describes is the organisational equivalent of the connected community that Russell and McKnight envision. Both are built from the inside out: beginning with the recognition and mobilisation of internal assets, extending those assets into the surrounding civic environment through strong and genuinely reciprocal relationships, and sustaining their vitality through continuous investment in the relational quality of every dimension of their shared life. This is the work of organisational citizenship: more demanding than conventional management, more resistant to simple metrics and more dependent on the quality of human relationship than any institutional framework can easily accommodate. But also, as the research consistently confirms, more durable and more generative.
Questions for reflection
Are you currently treating your organisational community as a passive audience to be managed, or as a rich milieu of assets to be genuinely mobilised?
What relationship within your organisation’s immediate milieu, whether internal or external, can you intentionally deepen this week in order to reinforce your long-term sustainability?
Think of the external components of your organisation’s milieu. Which are currently the strongest relationships, and which are the most neglected or transactional?
What would it mean for your organisation to adopt Puntenney’s definition of sustainability as its working standard, assessing its own health by the quality and depth of its relationships rather than by its financial metrics alone?
Inspired by: Puntenney, D.L. (cited in Russell, C. and McKnight, J. (2022) The connected community: discovering the health, wealth, and power of neighborhoods. Oakland, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.)
Leave A Comment