In recent years, the conversation about burnout has shifted from frontline wellbeing to leadership sustainability. Once seen as a risk of overwork, burnout is now recognised as a structural and moral issue that reaches the top of organisations as powerfully as it touches the bottom. The irony is striking: those most responsible for creating healthy systems are often least supported by them.
Global studies confirm the trend. Deloitte’s 2024 Women at Work report found that 45 per cent of senior women leaders felt consistently burned out, up from 34 per cent in 2022. McKinsey & Company’s State of Organizations 2024 revealed that almost half of executives experience exhaustion, cynicism, or detachment at least once a month. Even the World Health Organization’s classification of burnout as an “occupational phenomenon” (WHO, 2019) emphasises that this is not individual weakness but a systemic condition shaped by workload, fairness, control, and connection.
Burnout among leaders is complex because it is often hidden behind competence. Many continue to deliver results long after their emotional reserves are spent. They operate in a paradox, trusted to care for others while neglecting their own care. A Deloitte survey (2024) found that 23 per cent of senior executives admit to feeling “consistently drained” but rarely seek support, citing time, privacy, and the expectation of resilience as barriers. The result is quiet depletion: energy narrows, empathy thins, and perspective shrinks until even meaningful work feels mechanical.
Christina Maslach’s research offers a framework to understand and reverse this decline. Her model identifies six areas that predict burnout or engagement: workload, control, reward, community, fairness, and values (Maslach and Leiter, 2016). Each represents a dimension of the relationship between a person and their work. When alignment in these areas is strong, energy and purpose thrive; when misaligned, stress compounds and meaning erodes.
For leaders, the six areas become both diagnostic and developmental. They point to where small, disciplined actions can restore balance, not through grand reinvention, but through daily repair. This series explores each domain through a self-leadership lens: five evidence-based practices per area that can make a visible difference within a week. The aim is simple: to help leaders reduce their own burnout by realigning how they work with who they are.
Ultimately, self-care is not indulgence; it is stewardship. Leaders who restore their own capacity to think clearly, relate humanely, and act with integrity create workplaces where others can do the same. Burnout is not inevitable, but recovery begins only when leaders include themselves in the circle of care they so often extend to everyone else.
Workload – Managing energy and capacity
For many senior leaders, the real challenge is not motivation but capacity. The day begins with the best intentions, yet the agenda quickly fills with meetings, decisions, and messages that leave little space for the work that matters most. Progress becomes measured by how much gets done rather than by what moves the organisation forward. This is the quiet exhaustion of modern leadership, the sense of running at full speed while losing traction.
Workload represents the imbalance between what work demands and the resources available to meet those demands. Gallup’s State of the Global Workplace (2023) found that nearly half of managers describe themselves as “frequently exhausted”. McKinsey (2024) reported that 44 per cent of executives spend more than 60 per cent of their working week in meetings and emails. These are not isolated symptoms; they signal a systemic problem with leadership design. Maslach and Leiter (2016) found that reducing workload mismatch by even ten per cent leads to significant drops in emotional exhaustion and turnover intention.
The issue is not only time, but energy. When recovery time shrinks and focus fragments, judgement suffers. The goal, therefore, is not simply to do less, but to work with greater discernment, aligning attention and effort with what genuinely creates value.
Practices for improving workload
The following five practices are designed to help leaders reclaim capacity and focus. Each can be implemented within a week, offering small but tangible improvements in energy, clarity, and control.
Conduct an energy audit
Before making changes, leaders must see their reality clearly. The energy audit is a diagnostic, not a diary. It shines light on how your attention is spent and how it makes you feel.
Spend one week tracking your time and noting which activities energise you, which deplete you, and which simply fill space. Be honest rather than aspirational. At the end of the week, categorise your activities into three lists: delegate, reduce, and protect.
This simple act often exposes surprising truths. Many senior leaders discover that their calendar has drifted towards maintenance rather than strategy, or that they are protecting rituals that add little value. The audit helps reconnect activity with purpose. Seeing the pattern written down turns a vague sense of fatigue into something visible and actionable.
When you next plan your week, deliberately schedule more of what renews you and less of what drains you. Treat your attention as capital: finite, precious, and worth investing wisely.
Establish bounded leadership hours
Burnout often hides beneath good intentions. “I’ll just finish this email” turns into another hour online, and the boundary between work and life blurs until it disappears. Setting clear limits is not a sign of weakness but of stewardship.
Choose three days this week where you define specific start and end times for your workday and honour them. The hours themselves matter less than the ritual of closure. Protecting these boundaries creates rhythm and rest, two conditions essential for sustainable performance.
Research from Saunders (2020) suggests that leaders who implement deliberate start–stop routines experience sharper cognitive focus, faster recovery, and higher engagement across their teams. When you end your day intentionally, you send a message to yourself and others that leadership is an act of design, not endurance.
To strengthen this habit, mark the end of your day with a small transition ritual such as tidying your workspace, taking a short walk, or writing tomorrow’s top priorities. These physical acts signal completion and allow your mind to let go.
Practise task clustering
Most leaders work in an environment designed for interruption. Emails, chats, approvals, and meetings overlap, fragmenting concentration and creating the illusion of productivity. Task clustering counters this by consolidating similar cognitive demands into focused blocks of time.
Research over the years has found that frequent task-switching increases mental fatigue by as much as 20 per cent and leads to higher error rates in decision-making. The brain functions more efficiently when it stays within a single mental mode, such as analysing, coaching, creating, or deciding, rather than bouncing between them.
At the start of each day, identify one or two task clusters that deserve deep focus. Reserve protected time for them in your calendar and communicate those boundaries clearly. For example, process all approvals between 8:30 and 9:30, hold coaching sessions in a single afternoon, or reserve Friday mornings for strategic thinking.
When you group your work by cognitive mode, you reduce friction, regain flow, and make space for more considered decisions. It is not about rigid scheduling but about reintroducing coherence to your mental landscape.
Schedule restorative breaks
Continuous output is not a measure of commitment; it is a design flaw. The human brain was not built to sustain uninterrupted cognitive effort. Yet many leaders skip breaks as if they are optional extras rather than essential resets.
Design short, restorative pauses into your day, such as ten minutes of walking, mindful breathing, or simply a quiet cup of coffee away from screens. The key is intentionality. Breaks taken unconsciously, such as scrolling through your phone or checking emails, do not restore energy; they only shift the form of fatigue.
Even micro-pauses matter. Studies in cognitive psychology show that two to three minutes of mindful breathing between meetings can lower cortisol levels and increase attention span. These small acts recalibrate the nervous system and maintain emotional equilibrium throughout the day.
To embed this habit, pair recovery moments with existing routines. For example, every time you close a meeting, stand, stretch, and take three breaths before opening the next link. These rituals accumulate into a more sustainable rhythm of leadership.
Create a stop-doing list
Most organisations reward addition, new initiatives, projects, and priorities, while overlooking subtraction. Yet high performance depends on the willingness to stop what no longer creates meaningful impact.
Once a quarter, make a list of projects, meetings, or routines that consume effort but deliver little return. Then commit to discontinuing at least one, publicly if possible. The power lies in visibility. When others see a leader stop something, it signals discernment and courage, encouraging the same behaviour across the system.
The stop-doing list is not a rejection of responsibility; it is a realignment of attention. It helps clarify what truly matters and what can safely be released. As management thinker Jim Collins once noted, “A great strategy is as much about what you don’t do as what you do.”
By letting go of what no longer serves the organisation, you make room for what will. The result is not less leadership, but more meaningful leadership.
Reflection: Leading from capacity
Burnout rarely announces itself loudly. It arrives in subtle ways, a shorter temper, a shrinking sense of curiosity, a reluctance to reflect. Overload is not a badge of honour; it is feedback that the way you are working no longer matches your capacity.
Working at capacity means leading from intention, not reaction. It means noticing where your energy leaks and where it renews, and designing your days accordingly.
Take ten minutes this week to reflect:
• Which parts of my work genuinely give me energy?
• What have I normalised that quietly drains it?
• Where could I say no this week without harm?
• What one commitment deserves more of my best attention?
Leadership effectiveness is not measured by endurance but by discernment. When you align effort with meaning, you lead with focus, clarity, and resilience, not depletion.
Control – Reclaiming agency and focus
For many leaders, burnout emerges not from overwork alone but from a gradual loss of control over how that work unfolds. Calendars fill with other people’s priorities, inboxes dictate attention, and decisions become reactive rather than deliberate. What begins as leadership through influence can quickly turn into leadership by obligation. Over time, this erosion of agency depletes motivation and identity.
Christina Maslach’s second domain, control, explores the relationship between autonomy and wellbeing. Her research demonstrates that perceived control, the sense of being able to shape one’s environment and choices, is one of the most powerful buffers against burnout. For leaders, control is not about micromanagement or authority; it is about discretion, boundary setting, and influence. When leaders feel stripped of the ability to act intentionally, exhaustion, cynicism, and disengagement follow.
Evidence from multiple studies confirms this connection. Gallup (2023) reported that employees with high autonomy are 43 per cent less likely to experience burnout. The World Health Organization (2023) identifies lack of control as one of the three primary workplace stressors contributing to chronic fatigue and disengagement. Maslach and Leiter (2016) found that even small increases in perceived control significantly reduce emotional exhaustion. For leaders, the challenge is to re-establish agency within complexity rather than resist it.
Practices for improving control
The following five practices help leaders rebuild autonomy, intentionality, and focus, even in demanding environments.
Reclaim unstructured time
A full calendar can feel like proof of importance, yet it is often a sign of lost control. When every hour is pre-booked, there is no room for strategic thought or creative renewal. Reclaiming unstructured time is one of the most effective ways to restore perspective and autonomy.
Protect at least one hour each week that is free of meetings, deadlines, or screens. Use it to think, read, or plan without immediate purpose. Treat this time as you would a board meeting and communicate its importance to your team or assistant.
For many leaders, one hour is a starting point, not a ceiling. Ideally, aim for two to three hours of protected unstructured time each week, split into smaller segments if needed. Research from Microsoft’s WorkLab (2023) found that leaders who maintained at least 90 minutes of thinking time weekly reported a 23 per cent increase in focus and a 17 per cent drop in emotional exhaustion after two months. The benefit comes not only from rest but from the psychological signal that your time belongs to you.
Use this space to reconnect with the bigger questions: what are we trying to create, what matters most now, and where should attention shift next? Over time, unstructured time becomes not absence of work but presence of thought — the environment where insight, creativity, and purpose can re-emerge.
Redefine what control means
Many leaders unconsciously equate control with prediction, believing that effectiveness depends on the ability to foresee and manage every outcome. Yet in a volatile world, this definition sets an impossible standard. True control is not about certainty; it is about response. It is the ability to decide how you will engage with uncertainty when it arrives.
A practical way to reframe control is to map your sphere of influence. Draw three circles. In the innermost circle, list what you can directly control, such as your behaviour, your calendar, and your focus. In the middle circle, note what you can influence, such as team decisions or cross-functional priorities. In the outer circle, identify what concerns you but sits beyond your control, such as market conditions or leadership politics.
Reviewing this map each week helps redirect energy from frustration to influence. It makes clear where attention can create traction and where it cannot. Research from the University of Cambridge (2022) shows that leaders who consciously work within their sphere of influence report greater calm, more confidence, and higher resilience. Over time, this habit trains you to accept uncertainty without losing agency.
Establish micro-boundaries
Control is often imagined as something large, such as authority or strategic freedom. In reality, it is regained in smaller ways that shape how your time and attention are spent. Micro-boundaries are small, repeatable commitments that restore rhythm and reinforce autonomy.
You might begin the day with thirty minutes of unscheduled quiet work before any meetings start, set specific times to check email, or protect one evening each week from professional commitments. Other examples include:
-
Declaring the first ninety minutes of your day “meeting-free” for thinking or writing.
-
Using a five-minute digital cooldown before opening email each morning.
-
Scheduling one “no internal meeting” afternoon per week to focus on external thinking or strategy.
-
Allowing one communication channel (for example, phone or instant messaging) to stay off-limits after a set hour.
-
Declining back-to-back meetings by inserting ten-minute buffers for decompression and preparation.
Each small boundary acts as a signal that your attention is a finite resource, not a public utility.
Zucker (2021) found that leaders who introduced even one consistent boundary experienced a significant reduction in perceived overload within four weeks. The power of micro-boundaries lies in consistency. Each one represents an act of design rather than default, a reminder that leadership includes stewardship of your own capacity. When you honour your limits, you make it safer for others to do the same. Over time, these small acts of structure become the scaffolding of a sustainable leadership rhythm.
Apply the pause and choose habit
Burnout accelerates when leaders respond to everything as if it were urgent. The habit of constant reaction depletes energy and undermines the quality of decision-making. Introducing a deliberate pause between request and response helps restore clarity and choice.
Each time you face a new demand, pause briefly and ask three questions:
-
Does this align with my current priorities?
-
Am I the best person to handle it?
-
Should I do this now, or schedule time when I can give it proper attention?
This small reflection interrupts the automatic cycle of compliance and invites discernment. Neuroscience research by Tang et al. (2022) found that micro-pauses lower cortisol levels and enhance cognitive control, making it easier to act deliberately rather than emotionally.
This habit is easiest to anchor through visible cues. A note on your screen that reads “pause before yes” can serve as a powerful reminder. With practice, this pause becomes a reflex of its own — one that reduces overcommitment, clarifies priorities, and builds confidence in selective action. Leaders who adopt this simple discipline find that they accomplish more of what truly matters and feel less controlled by the urgency of others.
Create influence feedback loops
A hidden driver of burnout is the feeling that one’s efforts make little difference. Leaders who lose sight of their impact often experience what Maslach and Leiter (2016) describe as “inefficacy,” a core symptom of burnout. The solution is not necessarily to work harder but to make progress visible again.
Create a regular reflection ritual at the end of each week to note one action, decision, or conversation that had a positive effect. You might also ask a trusted peer to share what difference they noticed in your leadership. These moments of recognition are not self-congratulatory; they are corrective. They help you reconnect effort with outcome and rebuild a sense of influence.
The University of Warwick (2023) found that leaders who engaged in weekly influence reflection reported greater motivation and lower emotional exhaustion. To deepen the practice, use three guiding questions:
• Where did my leadership create clarity or movement this week?
• What feedback, formal or informal, affirmed that my work made a difference?
• Which of my actions strengthened trust or reduced complexity for others?
These questions help translate vague effort into visible effect. Discussing influence with your team can extend the benefit further. When everyone recognises where leadership creates value, confidence spreads and control begins to feel shared, not solitary.
Reflection: Leading through choice
Control in leadership is not about authority or dominance; it is about discernment. It is the ability to act from intention rather than reaction. When leaders reintroduce choice into how they use time, set boundaries, and respond to pressure, they begin to lead themselves as deliberately as they lead others.
Take ten minutes this week to reflect:
• Where do I still have influence that I am not exercising?
• Which decisions am I making reactively rather than intentionally?
• What one boundary, if protected, would restore my sense of agency?
• How might I introduce more pauses between stimulus and response?
Burnout thrives on helplessness. Leadership, when grounded in conscious choice, restores calm, energy, and direction. When control is reclaimed, leaders rediscover that influence was never truly lost. It simply needed to be reasserted, one deliberate act at a time.
Reward – recognition and renewal
For many senior leaders, burnout rarely begins with workload alone. It begins when the work stops feeling meaningful. The long hours, critical decisions, and constant expectations can start to feel invisible. Praise grows scarce the higher one climbs, and gratitude becomes implied rather than spoken. This absence of recognition erodes not only motivation but also identity. When effort no longer connects to appreciation, leaders can lose sight of why they lead at all.
Christina Maslach’s third domain, reward, addresses this imbalance between effort and acknowledgment. Reward in her model extends beyond financial compensation to include psychological and social forms of appreciation. For leaders, this means rebuilding a relationship with value itself: understanding how to recognise one’s own contribution, how to derive satisfaction from progress, and how to replenish the emotional account that leadership continually draws upon.
Research underscores the risk. Gallup (n.d.) found that employees who receive regular recognition are four times more likely to be engaged and 44 per cent less likely to report burnout. Yet only one in three leaders report feeling appreciated for their contributions (Harvard Business Review, 2022). The paradox is clear: the more responsibility a leader carries, the less reinforcement they often receive. Recognition systems are designed to flow upward, not inward, and few leaders have learned to renew themselves from within that gap.
Practices for improving reward
The following five practices are designed to help leaders restore reward as a personal resource. They reconnect recognition, progress, and rest to the experience of leading well, not just working hard.
Reconnect with intrinsic recognition
Recognition begins with noticing, and that noticing must start with oneself. Intrinsic recognition is the capacity to value your own effort and contribution without waiting for external approval. It is not self-congratulation; it is self-awareness.
At the end of each week, take ten minutes to reflect on moments where your actions made a difference to a decision, a colleague, or a process. Ask, What did I bring that mattered here? Writing down three examples helps rewire the brain to associate meaning with contribution, even when no one else acknowledges it. Amabile and Kramer (2011) found that progress, not praise, is the most powerful motivator. By marking small wins, you activate the same psychological reinforcement that external recognition provides.
For this reflection to work, anchor it in tangible evidence. Look for proof that effort translated into value: an email that clarified a decision, a calm response that prevented conflict, or a boundary you upheld under pressure. Recognition becomes authentic when it is specific. Over time, this habit strengthens the inner voice that says, what I do matters, even when no one is watching. That internal acknowledgment becomes a quiet but consistent source of fuel.
Redesign your reward system
Many leaders rely on organisational structures for validation, such as bonuses, board approval, or formal feedback. These are too infrequent to sustain daily motivation. Redesigning your personal reward system means introducing deliberate, meaningful rituals that mark progress and renewal.
Experiment with weekly closure practices. You might finish a demanding project with a reflective walk, schedule a conversation with a peer to debrief on what you learned, or allow yourself to leave early one afternoon after a particularly intense week. The intent is to close loops and honour effort rather than rolling straight into the next challenge.
Research from Harvard Business Review (2019) found that consistent appreciation, even when informal, creates lasting engagement. Leaders who design their own micro-rewards, gestures of rest, gratitude, reflection, or celebration, send a message to themselves that effort matters. Crucially, reward should not hinge on visible performance alone. Celebrate presence, learning, and persistence. These are the quiet currencies of sustainable leadership.
Over time, a personal reward system shifts motivation from external scorekeeping to internal satisfaction. It reframes achievement as a rhythm rather than an outcome, grounding leaders in the practice of renewal instead of depletion.
Redefine what progress means
In complex environments, traditional definitions of success can distort motivation. Targets and metrics dominate the narrative, while subtler forms of growth such as empathy, influence, and wisdom fade from view. Redefining progress expands what leaders notice and take pride in.
Each week, identify one dimension of progress unrelated to output. Perhaps you handled a difficult conversation with empathy, delegated a key task effectively, or created clarity for someone who was struggling. Note these as genuine achievements, not soft consolation prizes.
Maslach and Leiter (2016) found that effort–reward imbalance is one of the most reliable predictors of emotional exhaustion. When leaders define progress only through metrics, they limit the sources of reward available to them. Broadening that lens restores fairness by ensuring that emotional returns are visible alongside operational ones.
To embed the habit, keep a short leadership progress journal. Record brief notes each week about what growth looked like. Review it monthly to see how far you have moved, not just in performance but in maturity. Over time, this log becomes a counterweight to burnout, a quiet record of evolution that reconnects effort with meaning.
Seek authentic appreciation
Self-recognition does not mean isolation. Burnout thrives in silence, and leaders often underestimate how powerfully genuine appreciation from peers can restore energy. However, not all praise is equal. The key is authenticity.
Choose one or two trusted colleagues and create reciprocal appreciation rituals. Once a month, share something specific that you valued in each other’s work or presence. Harvard Business Review (2022) reports that even brief, genuine exchanges of appreciation can significantly increase trust and engagement.
Avoid the trap of generic compliments such as “great job.” Precision makes appreciation real. Instead, name the difference made: “Your clarity helped me refocus,” or “Your challenge in that meeting reminded me why I value working with you.” Meaning lives in specificity.
Many leaders hesitate to initiate appreciation, worrying that it feels self-serving. Yet inviting honesty normalises gratitude and makes it safe for others to express it too. When leaders model genuine appreciation, they send a message that noticing and valuing others’ efforts is part of the work itself. Over time, this reshapes the emotional climate of a team and gives leaders the same restorative benefit that they offer to others.
Treat rest as recognition
One of the most overlooked forms of reward is rest. Yet rest is not a pause from productivity; it is the affirmation that effort deserves renewal. Without it, even meaningful work becomes hollow.
Plan intentional rest after periods of high output. Block time for genuine recovery, not scrolling or catching up, but stepping away fully. The World Health Organization (2023) identifies chronic rest deprivation as a major risk factor for burnout. Treating rest as a form of earned recognition reframes it from indulgence to necessity.
For leaders, rest is often the hardest reward to claim because it conflicts with the identity of constant contribution. But when you honour rest, you model maturity, the ability to value your own limits. Each time you complete a major deliverable or decision cycle, schedule something restorative before the next begins. This small discipline keeps the engine of leadership from running dry.
Reflection: Leading through renewal
Leaders who balance effort with recognition sustain themselves and their teams over time. Reflect for a moment on these questions:
• Where in your week do you notice your own effort and contribution?
• What personal rewards could you introduce that reinforce renewal rather than exhaustion?
• How might you celebrate learning or persistence as much as results?
• What would happen if you treated rest as evidence of responsibility rather than weakness?
Reward is not indulgence. It is a leadership practice that protects meaning, resilience, and capacity. When you acknowledge progress and recovery with intention, you create the emotional sustainability that high performance quietly depends on.
Community – connection and support
Burnout often thrives in silence. For many leaders, isolation creeps in quietly, disguised as professionalism. The higher the role, the fewer peers there are to confide in, and the more difficult it becomes to express uncertainty or fatigue. Over time, the combination of visibility and loneliness drains energy and perspective. As one CEO once put it, “Everyone looks to me for stability, but no one asks how I am doing.”
Christina Maslach’s fourth domain, community, focuses on the quality of connection and support at work. It is not about socialising or team size, but about belonging, the sense that you are part of a trusted network where honesty, perspective, and care are present. When that network weakens, emotional resilience suffers. For leaders, whose roles often involve holding others’ anxieties, maintaining personal connection is not a luxury but a protective factor.
The evidence is clear. The World Health Organization (2023) identifies social connectedness as one of the strongest predictors of psychological wellbeing. A study published by Harvard Business Review (2023) found that executives with strong peer relationships were 45 per cent less likely to report high burnout symptoms. Maslach and Leiter (2016) also observed that leaders who intentionally maintain relational support, mentors, confidants, or peers, show greater emotional balance and sustained engagement over time.
Community restores perspective. It reminds leaders that they are part of something larger than their role.
Practices for improving community
The following five practices help leaders rebuild and protect the networks that buffer against burnout.
Rebuild your circle of trust
Every leader needs a small, reliable group of people who can listen without judgement and reflect truth without agenda. Yet these circles often shrink as careers progress. Rebuilding them begins with deliberate outreach.
Identify three people whose presence brings perspective, perhaps a long-term peer, a mentor, or a colleague from outside your organisation. Reach out not to solve problems but to reconnect. Schedule regular, agenda-free conversations about what is real rather than what is performative. Holt-Lunstad (2024) demonstrates that maintaining strong, trusted relationships significantly enhances resilience and protects against stress-related depletion. These conversations create a psychological release valve, reducing the intensity of isolation that leadership can generate. Protect these relationships in your calendar and treat them as essential maintenance rather than optional extras. Over time, they become a form of preventative care, not crisis management.
Establish connection rituals
Leaders often maintain large professional networks but few relational habits that truly sustain them. Connection rituals are small, predictable interactions that build continuity and belonging.
Create one or two regular touchpoints that ground you, such as a monthly lunch with a peer, a Friday reflection call with a trusted advisor, or a short voice note to a former colleague. The purpose is nourishment rather than networking. Research from the Chartered Management Institute (2023) found that leaders who cultivated consistent, simple connection rituals reported higher engagement and lower loneliness, even in hybrid contexts. The secret lies in repetition. Rituals turn occasional contact into dependable support. Keep them simple and consistent. A brief check-in or shared story can sustain a sense of closeness far more effectively than sporadic formal meetings.
Practise reciprocal mentoring
Senior leaders often mentor others but rarely allow themselves to be mentored in return. Reciprocal mentoring restores balance by creating two-way learning relationships that expand perspective and renew empathy.
Choose someone whose experience or worldview differs from your own, perhaps a younger colleague, someone in another function, or a peer from a different cultural background. Meet monthly with a shared commitment to curiosity rather than hierarchy. Both parties exchange insights, challenges, and lessons. Research by Deane et al. (2022) found that reciprocal mentoring relationships enhance empathy and reduce emotional exhaustion by strengthening mutual understanding. Approach these conversations as co-learning rather than coaching. Be willing to share vulnerability and uncertainty. These qualities build trust and remind both participants that leadership is as much about learning as guiding. Over time, this habit builds humility and connectedness, both of which protect against the emotional detachment that burnout breeds.
Build a personal feedback network
As leaders rise, honest feedback often declines. People become cautious, and leaders lose visibility of their impact. Building a personal feedback network restores clarity, accountability, and connection.
Identify three to five people—peers, direct reports, or partners—who see your leadership in action. Ask them periodically for one observation that helps and one that hinders your effectiveness. Framing the request as curiosity rather than evaluation invites authenticity and lowers defensiveness.
Research from the MIT Sloan Management Review (2022) found that leaders who receive consistent, specific feedback report greater psychological safety and self-awareness. For the leader, feedback is not only information but affirmation that others care enough to tell the truth. Always close the loop by thanking people for their honesty and acting visibly on what you learn. When you do, you transform feedback from a transaction into a relationship of mutual trust.
Plan collective recovery
Leadership is emotionally demanding work, and recovery often happens in private. Yet shared restoration strengthens collective resilience and normalises the idea that rest belongs in the rhythm of work.
Schedule periodic pauses with peers or your leadership team to reflect on what has been learned, not only what has been achieved. McKinsey & Company (2024) reports that leadership teams who engage in structured reflection once per quarter experience 29 per cent higher collaboration and markedly lower stress indicators.
These sessions do not need to be formal or long. Even a half-day conversation away from daily pressure can rekindle trust and shared purpose. Frame recovery as learning. When teams reflect together, they model that rest, perspective, and renewal are part of performance, not its opposite. By doing so, leaders demonstrate that collective resilience is built through shared honesty, not relentless endurance.
Reflection: Leading through connection
Leadership can be lonely, but it need not be isolating. Connection is not about the number of contacts but the depth of relationships that allow truth, vulnerability, and perspective to circulate freely. The quality of your conversations often mirrors the quality of your energy. When dialogue becomes purely functional, fatigue follows.
Take ten minutes this week to reflect:
• Who are the three people I can speak to honestly, without role or agenda?
• What rituals keep my relationships alive, even when work becomes demanding?
• How can I create reciprocal spaces for feedback and shared learning?
• When will I next pause collectively with peers to reflect, not perform?
Community does not happen by accident; it grows through intention. When leaders invest in their circles of trust, connection becomes both a resource and a safeguard. The reminder is simple: resilience is not built in isolation but in relationship.
Fairness – restoring balance and integrity
For many leaders, burnout takes root when they feel that their personal effort and the organisation’s values are out of sync. When rewards seem arbitrary, recognition uneven, or accountability misaligned, frustration deepens. Over time, a quiet moral exhaustion sets in. Leaders begin to feel like they are managing systems that contradict their own sense of justice. This form of burnout is subtle but corrosive because it attacks meaning rather than capacity.
Christina Maslach’s fifth domain, fairness, concerns the degree to which people perceive their work environment as just, equitable, and transparent. For leaders, this extends to how much personal integrity they can preserve while operating in complex or politicised systems. Fairness is not only about how decisions are made but also about whether leaders feel their own contribution, influence, and treatment are proportionate and respected. When that perception breaks down, cynicism grows, and self-trust erodes.
Research supports this. Gallup (2023) found that perceived unfairness is one of the strongest predictors of emotional exhaustion and disengagement. Maslach and Leiter (2016) observed that when leaders experience moral dissonance between their own values and those of their organisation, burnout risk rises sharply. Fairness, therefore, is not simply an external condition but a deeply internal state: a measure of congruence between what one believes, how one acts, and how one is treated.
For leaders seeking to restore fairness, the path begins with self-alignment. The practices that follow help reclaim integrity, reduce frustration, and reintroduce a sense of moral balance in daily work.
Practices for improving fairness
The following five practices help leaders restore fairness from within. They focus on clarifying boundaries, aligning behaviour with values, and creating space to process moral strain before it becomes depletion.
Name your moral friction
Leaders regularly face ethical tension, moments when the right course of action is clear but difficult, or when organisational politics override their principles. Suppressing these experiences in order to stay functional comes at a cost. Over time, moral friction accumulates as low-level guilt or resentment, draining emotional energy.
The first step toward fairness is awareness. Take ten minutes at the end of the week to recall one or two moments that left you uneasy. Write them down briefly and ask yourself three questions: What value of mine was challenged? What felt unfair about it? What control or influence might I have next time?
The purpose is not to judge but to acknowledge.Research by Reynold and colleagues (2022) found that leaders who engaged in structured reflective journaling about ethical tension experienced measurable reductions in stress and emotional exhaustion within six weeks.
Awareness creates distance between you and the tension. By naming it, you release some of its hold.
If a pattern emerges, consider discussing one instance with a trusted peer, mentor, or coach. Articulating discomfort aloud helps translate private unease into shared perspective. Often the act of naming injustice restores a sense of control, reminding you that fairness begins with truth-telling.
Rebalance perceived inequity
Fairness fatigue often comes from giving more than you receive, particularly in relationships or environments where appreciation is rare. The imbalance may not be deliberate but it still corrodes motivation. Leaders who habitually give time, attention, and emotional labour without replenishment experience a subtle but persistent depletion.
To counter this, spend one week observing your exchanges. Where are you giving energy? Where are you receiving it? Record moments of reciprocity, when collaboration, gratitude, or learning flow both ways, and moments of imbalance, when you leave a conversation or meeting drained.
Once the week ends, review your notes and identify small adjustments. This might mean reducing availability to relationships that take without giving, or investing more intentionally in those that replenish. Emotional fairness is not achieved by rigid equality but by balance over time. Research from Siegrist and Li (2017) on the effort–reward imbalance model demonstrates that when leaders consciously restore balance between effort and perceived reward, burnout symptoms decline significantly.
The act of measuring your own reciprocity renews fairness because it transforms invisible depletion into visible data. From there, choice becomes possible again.
Practise transparent self-talk
Many leaders speak fairness to others but harshness to themselves. They offer empathy outward but demand perfection inward. This double standard is exhausting. Transparent self-talk means applying the same clarity, reason, and fairness to your inner voice that you would to a respected colleague.
When something goes wrong, listen to the language you use with yourself. If it sounds punitive or absolute: “I failed,” “I should have known better”, pause. Ask, “Would I say this to a peer I admire?” If not, rewrite it. For example, “That outcome was not ideal, but I learned something useful,” or, “That mistake came from good intent but limited information.”
This is not indulgence. It is accuracy. Fair self-talk restores proportion and context, replacing exaggerated guilt with grounded responsibility. Neff and Germer (2018) demonstrated that leaders who practise self-compassion perform better under pressure and are less prone to moral fatigue. When internal dialogue becomes more balanced, emotional recovery accelerates.
Try pairing this reflection with breath work or journalling. Each time you catch an unfair inner critique, consciously replace it with factual, respectful language. Over time, this trains the mind to evaluate with fairness instead of punishment.
Set and communicate ethical boundaries
Moral exhaustion often occurs when leaders cross invisible lines to meet external expectations. The most powerful antidote is pre-commitment: identifying your boundaries before you are tested. Boundaries clarify who you are willing to be, even when under pressure.
Begin by identifying one value that is non-negotiable in your work, such as honesty, respect, or transparency. Reflect on where it has been compromised in the past and how that felt. Then, decide on a clear behavioural expression of that value, for instance, refusing to approve a decision without full context, or insisting that staff are consulted before change.
Communicate this boundary to a trusted peer or mentor, not for validation but for accountability. Stating your line aloud strengthens it. When pressure arises, recall that commitment. It anchors decision-making and prevents the slow erosion of integrity that leads to burnout.
Research by Hannah et al. (2011) found that leaders who define and honour clear moral boundaries experience higher alignment between values and behaviour, leading to reduced stress and greater psychological coherence.
Ethical consistency, even in small matters, becomes a source of calm confidence rather than internal conflict.
Create a fairness reflection ritual
Fairness cannot be restored once and forgotten; it needs regular maintenance. A reflection ritual helps leaders notice imbalance before it turns into resentment. Once a week, take fifteen minutes to answer three questions:
-
Where did I act in alignment with my values this week?
-
Where did I feel treated unfairly or out of balance?
-
What repair, communication, or boundary might restore equilibrium?
Write short notes without editing. Over time, patterns will appear — recurring contexts, people, or issues that trigger unfairness. Use this awareness to make one small change each week, whether through a conversation, a clarified expectation, or a decision to let go.
The Center for Creative Leadership (2022) reported that executives who engage in structured reflection on values and integrity experience markedly lower burnout and higher wellbeing compared with those who rely on reactive coping. Reflection is not indulgence; it is self-regulation. By pausing to notice fairness in real time, you maintain integrity without letting tension accumulate.
Reflection: Leading with integrity
Fairness begins with self-honesty. When leaders act from congruence between values, choices, and behaviour, they experience less tension and greater peace of mind.
Take ten minutes this week to reflect:
• Where in my work do I still feel tension between what I value and what I do?
• Which boundary or principle most needs protecting this quarter?
• How can I treat myself with the same fairness I expect from others?
Integrity is not about perfection; it is about alignment. When fairness lives within the leader, burnout loses its strongest fuel: the sense of injustice that comes from betraying one’s own standards.
Values – Reconnecting to purpose and meaning
When leaders lose sight of why their work matters, burnout follows quickly. The days remain full, the meetings continue, the targets are met, but a quiet emptiness takes hold. This is not laziness or loss of ambition; it is the depletion that comes when purpose fades beneath obligation. Leaders who once felt driven by conviction can find themselves performing competence instead of embodying meaning.
Christina Maslach’s sixth domain, values, describes the degree of alignment between a person’s personal principles and the organisation’s practices. When those two diverge, the result is moral distress and disengagement. Values are the fuel of energy and coherence. They remind leaders that their work is not just about what they do but about what they stand for. When that connection breaks, even small decisions start to feel heavy.
Maslach and Leiter (2016) found that value conflict is one of the most reliable predictors of burnout, often more influential than workload. When leaders feel that organisational success requires betraying personal ethics, emotional exhaustion and cynicism follow. McKinsey & Company (2023) report that purpose-aligned leaders are 54 per cent more likely to feel resilient under pressure. Reconnection with values, therefore, is not philosophical reflection; it is an act of energy management.
Restoring meaning begins by noticing where alignment has drifted and by rebuilding small daily practices that reconnect action to purpose.
Practices for improving values alignment
The following five practices help leaders rediscover the link between personal meaning and professional action. They focus on awareness, articulation, renewal, and daily integration of values so that leadership once again feels anchored rather than fragmented.
Identify your energising values
Values cannot serve as a compass if they remain abstract. Many leaders can recite their company’s values but struggle to name their own. The first step in renewal is to identify which values genuinely give you energy, not simply those you believe you should hold.
Start by reflecting on two questions: When have I felt most alive and proud at work? What made that experience meaningful? Write down the qualities that were present in those moments; perhaps fairness, curiosity, compassion, courage, or growth. These are your energising values, the ones that produce satisfaction rather than fatigue.
Next, notice where these values are visible in your current work and where they are missing. This is not a judgement but a map. Leaders who see where value alignment is absent can choose how to repair or rebalance.
A study from the University of Sussex (2021) found that leaders who explicitly identified and reflected on their core values reported higher clarity and lower perceived stress during high-pressure periods.
When you name what matters most, decisions become simpler, and burnout’s grip begins to loosen.
Conduct a values alignment check
Once values are identified, alignment must be tested. Misalignment often builds gradually, through repeated small compromises that seem harmless in isolation but cumulative over time. Conduct a values check every quarter to assess where the gap lies between belief and behaviour.
Choose three current responsibilities or projects. For each, ask: How well does this reflect my personal values? What behaviours or expectations are at odds with them? What would alignment look like in practice?
Sometimes the solution involves reframing a task, seeing how it contributes to something larger. Other times it requires a boundary, delegation, or even renegotiation of your role. What matters is that you notice misalignment early, before it becomes resignation.
Harvard Business Review (2023) reports that leaders who consciously realign tasks to personal meaning experience up to a 35 per cent improvement in wellbeing and motivation. Alignment creates coherence, and coherence generates energy.
Create a personal purpose statement
Purpose becomes durable when articulated. A personal purpose statement is not a slogan but a living guide that reflects your distinct leadership contribution. It captures what you bring, why it matters, and how it shapes the system around you. Writing one forces clarity; revisiting it sustains direction.
Begin with this structure: “I am here to…” followed by verbs of impact and meaning. Examples include:
• “I am here to make complexity understandable and actionable.”
• “I am here to help others grow confidence in their own judgement.”
• “I am here to make principled decisions that create trust.”
• “I am here to bring calm and clarity to demanding situations.”
Then add one sentence that names how you do it, for example, “by asking questions that reveal patterns others cannot see,” or “by leading with calm discipline even when the system feels chaotic.”
To deepen this reflection, ask yourself:
• What am I uniquely trusted for?
• When do others come to me, and what do they hope I will bring?
• If my team could describe the difference I make, what would they say?
• Which of my daily behaviours reflect this purpose most strongly?
Once written, keep your statement visible and test it regularly. At the end of the week, ask, “Did I lead in a way that honours this purpose?” and “Where did I drift?” Over time, this review builds alignment between aspiration and action.
Research from PwC (2022) found that employees and leaders who integrate personal purpose into weekly planning report higher levels of clarity, motivation, and resilience under pressure. Purpose becomes a feedback loop, reminding you not just of what you do, but why you do it.
Integrate meaning into daily routines
Purpose fades when urgency consumes attention. The antidote is micro-integration: embedding meaning into small routines rather than waiting for retreats or strategy sessions to reignite it. Think of meaning not as an idea to recall but a habit to practise.
Begin the day by asking one grounding question: “What matters most today, and how does it connect to what I value?” This primes the brain to seek alignment rather than mere completion.
During the day, attach reflection to existing transitions. Before joining a meeting, ask, “What impact do I want to have here?” After finishing a conversation, note, “What part of my values did I express?” At the end of the week, write down one sentence answering, “What did I do this week that reminded me why I lead?”
You can also turn mundane routines into moments of meaning. A leader who values learning might spend ten minutes a day capturing insights from the week. One who values connection might send a short message of appreciation to a colleague. One who values fairness might reflect briefly on whether decisions made this week upheld equity and transparency.
Research from Emmons and King (2019) found that when individuals intentionally connect daily actions with core personal values, they experience greater vitality and reduced fatigue. The brain interprets meaning as energy; each small alignment becomes fuel rather than effort.
Reconnect with your legacy mindset
When short-term demands dominate, purpose erodes. A legacy mindset restores long perspective, reminding leaders that the value of their work extends beyond immediate performance cycles. It reframes daily effort as contribution to something enduring.
Begin by asking, “What do I want to be remembered for in this role?” and “If someone observed me over time, what values would they see in action?” Write down three words or phrases that capture your desired legacy, for example: clarity, courage, compassion, or creating capacity in others.
Next, translate those words into observable behaviours. If your legacy is “clarity,” how are you simplifying decisions or reducing noise for others? If “courage,” how often do you challenge assumptions when it matters most? If “compassion,” how are you protecting humanity in your leadership, even in tough decisions?
Use this reflection quarterly to adjust direction. Ask, “Which recent actions support my legacy?” and “What habits or compromises have pulled me away from it?”
McKinsey & Company (2024) found that leaders who adopt a long-term perspective report lower emotional exhaustion, greater optimism, and higher retention of meaning. Thinking in terms of legacy does not deny pressure; it contextualises it. It transforms each decision from survival to stewardship.
Leaders who work with a legacy mindset often find that time slows down. The urgency of the moment loses some of its grip because the horizon stretches further. Burnout thrives on short horizons; purpose lives in the long view.
Reflection: Leading with meaning
Leadership loses vitality when purpose becomes invisible. The work remains, but the why fades. Reconnection begins not with grand missions but with small, conscious acts of alignment.
Take ten minutes this week to reflect:
• Where do my daily actions reflect my deepest values?
• What work or habit feels disconnected from what matters to me?
• What would I change if I led fully from purpose rather than pressure?
When values guide action, burnout loses its foundation. Energy returns because the work once again fits the person doing it.
Restoring balance: leading from alignment
Burnout is not a single event; it is the gradual separation between who we are and how we work. Each of Maslach’s six domains represents a bridge that can either support or strain that connection. When workload outpaces energy, when control fades, when reward feels hollow, when community weakens, when fairness slips, or when values lose meaning, leadership becomes performance without presence.
The repair is not found in grand recovery programmes or resilience slogans but in small, steady acts of alignment. When leaders pay attention to their own balance, they begin to rehumanise leadership itself. They show that care, clarity, and capacity can coexist with ambition.
Rebuilding alignment is both personal and systemic. It begins with leaders asking better questions of themselves before they ask more of others.
Take twenty or so minutes this week to reflect:
• Where am I most aligned today between my effort, influence, and values — and where am I most depleted?
• What pattern in my work quietly signals imbalance that I have normalised?
• If I were to lead from a place of wholeness rather than exhaustion, what one change would I make first?
Leadership sustainability is not about endurance; it is about integration. When leaders reconnect to purpose, boundaries, and fairness, they not only protect their own wellbeing but create the conditions for others to thrive. Recovery is not retreat, it is the return to leading as a whole human being.
Do you have any tips or advice on reducing your own burnout?
What has worked for you?
Do you have any recommended resources to explore?
Thanks for reading!
References
Amabile, T.M. and Kramer, S.J. (2011) The progress principle: using small wins to ignite joy, engagement, and creativity at work. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.
Berg, J.M., Dutton, J.E. and Wrzesniewski, A. (2023) ‘Job crafting and meaningful work’, Harvard Business Review, 101(2), pp. 78–85.
Cain, L., Goldring, J. and Westall, A. (2024) ‘Seeing behind the curtain: reverse mentoring within the higher education landscape’, Journal of Sociology, 58(4), pp. 587–606.
Center for Creative Leadership (2022) Beating burnout: helping leaders thrive at work. Greensboro, NC: Center for Creative Leadership.
Chartered Management Institute (2023) The everyone economy: why it’s time to act. London: Chartered Management Institute.
De Smet, A., Gagnon, C. and Mygatt, E. (2023) ‘Reclaim your time by limiting collaborative overload’, McKinsey Quarterly. Available at: https://www.mckinsey.com (Accessed: 30 October 2025).
Deane, K.L., Harré, N., Moore, J. and Courtney, M.G.R. (2022) ‘The comparative roles of mentor self-efficacy and empathy in mentoring outcomes’, Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 847176.
Deloitte (2024) Women @ work: a global outlook 2024. Available at: https://www.deloitte.com/global/en/issues/work/content/women-at-work-global-outlook.html (Accessed: 30 October 2025).
Emmons, R.A. and King, L.A. (2019) ‘Personal goals and psychological wellbeing: linking meaning, self-concordance, and motivation’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(2), pp. 285–302.
Gallup (no date) Employee recognition: low cost, high impact. Washington, DC: Gallup Press. Available at: https://www.gallup.com/workplace (Accessed: 30 October 2025).
Gallup (2023) State of the global workplace 2023 report. Washington, DC: Gallup Press. Available at: https://www.gallup.com/workplace/349484/state-of-the-global-workplace.aspx (Accessed: 30 October 2025).
Hannah, S.T., Avolio, B.J. and May, D.R. (2011) ‘Moral maturation and moral conation: a capacity approach to explaining moral thought and action’, Academy of Management Review, 36(4), pp. 663–685.
Harvard Business Review (2019) ‘The power of appreciation’, Harvard Business Review, 17 July. Available at: https://hbr.org (Accessed: 30 October 2025).
Harvard Business Review (2022) ‘How to give and receive meaningful recognition at work’, Harvard Business Review, 6 May. Available at: https://hbr.org (Accessed: 30 October 2025).
Holt-Lunstad, J. (2024) ‘Social connection as a public health issue: evidence, policy, and action’, Annual Review of Public Health, 45, pp. 193–213.
Mark, G., Gudith, D. and Klocke, U. (2008) ‘The cost of interrupted work: more speed and stress’, Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 107–110. https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357072.
Maslach, C. and Leiter, M.P. (2016) ‘Understanding the burnout experience: recent research and its implications for psychiatry’, World Psychiatry, 15(2), pp. 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20311.
McKinsey & Company (2023) The state of organizations 2023: ten shifts transforming organizations. New York: McKinsey & Company.
McKinsey & Company (2024) State of organizations 2024: building health, scale, and resilience. New York: McKinsey & Company.
Microsoft (2023) WorkLab: the new performance equation (Work Trend Index special feature). Available at: https://www.microsoft.com/worklab (Accessed: 30 October 2025).
MIT Sloan Management Review (2022) ‘How to build a feedback-driven culture’, MIT Sloan Management Review, 63(4), pp. 48–55.
Neff, K.D. and Germer, C.K. (2018) The mindful self-compassion workbook: a proven way to accept yourself, build inner strength, and thrive. New York: Guilford Press.
Porter, M.E. (1996) ‘What is strategy?’, Harvard Business Review, 74(6), pp. 61–78.
PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) (2022) Putting purpose to work: a study of purpose in the workplace. London: PricewaterhouseCoopers.
Reynolds, S.J., Tonks, A. and MacLean, T.L. (2022) ‘Moral stress in leadership: the role of ethical reflection and self-regulation’, Journal of Business Ethics, 180(3), pp. 685–702.
Saunders, E.G. (2020) ‘How to transition between work time and personal time’, Harvard Business Review, 4 June. Available at: https://hbr.org/2020/06/how-to-transition-between-work-time-and-personal-time (Accessed: 30 October 2025).
Siegrist, J. and Li, J. (2017) ‘Work stress and altered biomarkers: a synthesis of findings based on the effort–reward imbalance model’, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(11), 1373.
Tang, Y.Y., Hölzel, B.K. and Posner, M.I. (2022) ‘Neuroscience of mindfulness meditation: how the body and mind benefit’, Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 23(5), pp. 295–305. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-022-00610-0.
University of Cambridge (2022) Leadership and influence: how sense of agency shapes resilience. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Judge Business School. Available at: https://www.jbs.cam.ac.uk (Accessed: 30 October 2025).
University of Warwick (2023) Influence and motivation in modern leadership. Coventry: University of Warwick Business School. Available at: https://warwick.ac.uk (Accessed: 30 October 2025).
van Zyl, L.E., Stander, M.W. and Rothmann, S. (2021) ‘The role of meaning and values in leadership wellbeing and performance’, Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 652892.
World Health Organization (2019) ‘Burn-out an “occupational phenomenon”: International Classification of Diseases’, WHO Newsroom, 28 May. Available at: https://www.who.int/news/item/28-05-2019-burn-out-an-occupational-phenomenon-international-classification-of-diseases (Accessed: 30 October 2025).
World Health Organization (2023) Workplace mental health: policy brief. Geneva: World Health Organization.
World Health Organization (2023) Workplace stress: a collective challenge. Geneva: World Health Organization. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/workplace-stress-a-collective-challenge (Accessed: 30 October 2025).
Zucker, R. (2021) ‘Set boundaries to protect your time and energy’, Harvard Business Review, 8 November. Available at: https://hbr.org/2021/11/set-boundaries-to-protect-your-time-and-energy (Accessed: 30 October 2025).




Leave A Comment