We live in a culture that often prizes composure over candour. In workplaces, people are rewarded for rational analysis and calm detachment, while in families and friendships, many grow up with the message that emotions should be hidden or controlled. Against this backdrop, openly expressing feelings can feel risky or even inappropriate. The result is that many people carry emotions privately, seldom giving them voice in ways others can hear.

In the EQ-i model, emotional expression is defined as the ability to openly express one’s feelings, both verbally and non-verbally, in a way that others can understand (Stein & Book, 2011). It extends beyond simply “showing emotion” to include communicating feelings in a form that can be received and shared. Emotional expression does not mean unfiltered outbursts, nor does it mean suppressing emotions until they disappear. It is the practice of giving emotions clear, constructive voice.

The absence of expression carries significant costs. Suppressed emotions tend to surface indirectly in irritability, withdrawal, sarcasm, or stress symptoms in the body (Gross, 2002). Leaders who hide frustration may come across as cold or disengaged. Teams where joy is unexpressed can become transactional and lifeless. Relationships where sadness or anger are muted often lose intimacy and trust.

By contrast, the presence of expression creates connection. Research shows that people who communicate their emotions openly experience greater relationship satisfaction, stronger support networks, and higher well-being (King & Emmons, 1990; Srivastava et al., 2009). Naming and sharing feelings allows others to understand not only what you think, but what you care about. It transforms emotion from a private burden into shared information that deepens collaboration and trust.

Why emotional expression matters

If emotional expression is the ability to voice what we feel, the natural question is: why does it matter? Why give attention to something that many treat as optional or even dangerous?

Resilience under pressure

Unexpressed emotions tend to intensify. Research on emotional suppression shows it increases physiological stress and reduces relationship closeness (Gross & John, 2003). By contrast, openly expressing emotions, even briefly, reduces stress responses and improves coping. A manager who says, “I feel anxious about this deadline,” not only relieves internal pressure but also creates space for collective problem-solving.

Better decision-making

Emotions carry information about values, boundaries, and needs. When they remain unspoken, decisions risk being skewed by hidden drivers. A leader who feels anger but suppresses it may tolerate repeated violations of fairness. By expressing the anger with words such as, “I feel frustrated because this is not equitable,” they clarify both the value at stake and the path forward. Expression translates inner signals into shared data for wiser action.

Stronger relationships and leadership

Trust grows when people express what they feel in a way that others can understand. Leaders who name their emotions transparently with phrases such as, “I am disappointed because I value quality,” or “I am proud because this reflects our effort,” give their teams an accurate reading of the moment. This openness reduces misinterpretation, builds psychological safety, and fosters resilience in groups (Edmondson, 1999).

A foundation skill

In the EQ-i framework, emotional expression is not an optional extra but a foundational capacity. It underpins empathy, assertiveness, and healthy relationships. Without it, emotions remain invisible and misinterpreted. With it, they become a resource for clarity, trust, and connection.

Levels of expression: low, balanced, and overused

Emotional expression reflects the capacity to communicate feelings openly, clearly, and appropriately through both verbal and non-verbal channels. In the EQ-i model, this composite describes how a leader shares their internal emotional experience in ways that support understanding, authenticity, and connection. The developmental question is not whether a person expresses emotion, but how proportionately and constructively they do so. When expressed in balance, emotional expression builds trust, reduces ambiguity, and strengthens relationships. When underused it results in secrecy, emotional opacity, and difficulty being understood. When overused it can overwhelm others, blur boundaries, or create discomfort. The table below summarises how this composite typically presents across low, healthy, and overused expression.

Low

Balanced

Overused

Appears closed, guarded, or difficult to read.

Shares feelings openly and appropriately.

Shares too much personal detail or emotion.

Struggles to articulate emotions, relying on silence or understatement.

Expresses emotions clearly without dominating interactions.

Makes others uncomfortable through oversharing.

Seen as an enigma; others guess what they feel or think.

Communicates feelings in ways that support understanding and trust.

Becomes melodramatic or emotionally intense.

Keeps emotions private even when expression would help collaboration.

Balances honesty with tact in emotionally charged situations.

Overwhelms others with frequent or unfiltered expression.

Emotional needs remain invisible, creating distance or misunderstanding.

Uses expression to strengthen connection and resolve tension.

Blurs boundaries by expressing emotion without regard for context.

Balancing factors that keep emotional expression healthy and proportionate

Emotional expression is strengthened and regulated by other emotional skills that help leaders communicate with clarity, respect, and attunement. These balancing factors ensure expression neither becomes suppressed nor overwhelming.

Interpersonal relationships: Interpersonal relationships provide the relational sensitivity that guides how emotions are expressed. Leaders with strong relational skills understand what others need in the moment, which helps them calibrate how much to share and how openly to communicate. This prevents emotional expression from becoming intrusive or misaligned. Healthy relationships create the psychological safety in which authentic expression can flourish without creating discomfort or imbalance.

Assertiveness: Assertiveness gives emotional expression structure. It enables leaders to state their feelings clearly, confidently, and respectfully without aggression or avoidance. Assertiveness prevents emotional expression from collapsing into passivity at the low end or emotional intensity at the high end. It ensures that feelings are communicated with boundary, timing, and intention, balancing honesty with responsibility.

Empathy: Empathy allows leaders to consider the emotional impact of their expression on others. When empathy is strong, leaders are able to read the room, gauge how their feelings may land, and adjust their communication accordingly. This prevents expression from overwhelming others or shifting conversations away from what others need. Empathy ensures emotional expression remains relational rather than self-focused, supporting connection rather than disruption.

Eight practices for building emotional expression

Like all dimensions of emotional intelligence, expression does not grow through theory alone. It is cultivated through practice, in the ordinary moments where we choose whether to speak or stay silent, to show or to hide. These eight exercises are designed as doorways into expression. Some are reflective, such as journalling and reframing. Others are embodied, like rehearsing posture and tone. Still others are relational, inviting you to practise expression in dialogue, gratitude, or storytelling.

Each exercise is structured in the same way:

  • Overview explains the purpose and spirit.

  • Steps guide you through the process.

  • Examples show it in real contexts.

  • Variations suggest ways to adapt.

  • Why it matters grounds the practice in research and lived insight.

The order matters less than the intention. You may begin anywhere. Over time, the practices reinforce one another: reframing emotion makes expression safer; embodied rehearsal makes it stronger; gratitude practice makes it more joyful. Each one helps shift emotion from private weight to shared connection.

These practices are not about dramatic displays or losing control. They are about presence. They allow you to speak feelings as signals, messages, and bridges, so that others can understand not only your thoughts but also your heart.

Conclusion: Speaking emotions into life

Emotional expression is not a one-time skill to master. It is a daily practice of giving voice to what matters, in ways that others can hear and understand. The eight exercises in this article are not techniques to perform but doorways into presence. Each one offers a way to bring feelings out of the shadows of silence and into the shared space of dialogue and connection.

This matters because emotions are not side notes to life. They are signals, teachers, and bridges. When suppressed, they become distortions that surface in stress, withdrawal, or conflict. When expressed, they become pathways to trust, resilience, and understanding. To practise emotional expression is to choose openness over hiding, clarity over confusion, and connection over distance.

The practices outlined here are deliberately varied. A thought–feeling log helps you see the patterns beneath silence. Reframing emotion as resource turns fear into information. Embodied rehearsal teaches the body to align with words. Anchoring allows you to summon confidence at will. Gratitude in action transforms appreciation into connection. Narrative externalisation gives difficult emotions a voice without shame. Together, these practices form a cycle of expression: noticing, embodying, reframing, voicing, and sharing.

Emotional expression is not about dramatic displays or constant openness. It is about choice. It gives you the ability to decide when and how to voice what you feel, with honesty and clarity. Over time, this practice strengthens not only relationships but also self-trust. You come to know that you can face your emotions, name them, and speak them into life.

Reflective questions

  • Which of the eight practices feels most natural for you to try, and which feels most stretching? What does that reveal?

  • In what settings do you most often mute your emotions, and what would change if you voiced them more directly?

  • Which emotion in your life most needs a healthier expression: anger, sadness, joy, or fear? What practice might open that doorway?

  • How might your relationships shift if you spoke feelings not only in moments of tension but also in moments of gratitude and joy?

Emotional expression is not about becoming someone else. It is about becoming more fully yourself. By practising expression, you create the possibility of relationships rooted in trust and a life lived with greater clarity and connection.

Do you have any tips or advice on practising emotional expression?

What has worked for you?

Do you have any recommended resources to explore?

Thanks for reading!


Emotional Expression is one of three components of the Self Expression facet from the MHS EQ-i Emotional Intelligence model, along with Independence and Assertiveness.

Sources

Bandler, R. and Grinder, J. (1979) Frogs into princes: Neuro linguistic programming. Moab, UT: Real People Press.

Barrett, L.F. (2006) ‘Solving the emotion paradox: Categorization and the experience of emotion’, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(1), pp. 20–46.

Barrett, L.F. (2017) How emotions are made: The secret life of the brain. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

Edmondson, A. (1999) ‘Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), pp. 350–383.

Ellis, A. (1955) ‘New approaches to psychotherapy techniques’, Journal of Clinical Psychology, 11(3), pp. 207–260.

Goleman, D. (1995) Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. New York: Bantam.

Greenberg, L.S. (2002) Emotion-focused therapy: Coaching clients to work through their feelings. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Gross, J.J. (2002) ‘Emotion regulation: Affective, cognitive, and social consequences’, Psychophysiology, 39(3), pp. 281–291.

Gross, J.J. and John, O.P. (2003) ‘Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), pp. 348–362.

Hayes, S.C., Strosahl, K.D. and Wilson, K.G. (1999) Acceptance and commitment therapy: An experiential approach to behavior change. New York: Guilford Press.

Kabat-Zinn, J. (1990) Full catastrophe living: Using the wisdom of your body and mind to face stress, pain, and illness. New York: Delacorte.

King, L.A. and Emmons, R.A. (1990) ‘Conflict over emotional expression: Psychological and physical correlates’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(5), pp. 864–877.

Lieberman, M.D., Eisenberger, N.I., Crockett, M.J., Tom, S.M., Pfeifer, J.H. and Way, B.M. (2007) ‘Putting feelings into words: Affect labeling disrupts amygdala activity in response to affective stimuli’, Psychological Science, 18(5), pp. 421–428.

Mehrabian, A. (1971) Silent messages. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Niedenthal, P.M. (2007) ‘Embodying emotion’, Science, 316(5827), pp. 1002–1005.

Seligman, M.E.P. (2002) Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment. New York: Free Press.

Seligman, M.E.P. and Schulman, P. (1986) ‘Explanatory style as a predictor of productivity and quitting among life insurance sales agents’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(4), pp. 832–838.

Srivastava, S., Tamir, M., McGonigal, K.M., John, O.P. and Gross, J.J. (2009) ‘The social costs of emotional suppression: A prospective study of the transition to college’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(4), pp. 883–897.

Stein, S.J. and Book, H.E. (2011) The EQ edge: Emotional intelligence and your success. 3rd edn. Mississauga, ON: Wiley.

Tulving, E. and Thomson, D.M. (1973) ‘Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory’, Psychological Review, 80(5), pp. 352–373.

White, M. and Epston, D. (1990) Narrative means to therapeutic ends. New York: W.W. Norton.